PM Lee highlights 'Hope, Heart, and Home' in National Day Rally
Yahoo! News Singapore, 26 Aug 2012
Hope,
heart, and home – the three Hs were the overarching themes in Prime
Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s National Day Rally Speech on Sunday evening.
During
his two-hour rally at the University Cultural Centre, PM Lee asked of
Singaporeans at home and the 1,500-strong audience in front of him,
"What is the next chapter of the Singapore story?".
Speaking first in
Malay, Mandarin and then English, the 60-year-old unveiled a series of
new measures to tackle education, popluation and healthcare challenges
to ensure the city-state stays competitive and relevant over the next 20
years.
Full story
Related:
Paternity leave, HDB for singles welcomed - Yahoo! News Singapore
PM Lee's NDR speech a break from the past: analysts - Yahoo! News Singapore
read more
No one, except newly minted citizens and PRs, is surprised by the
overall tone and thrust of quiet PM Lee’ s National Day Speech. In line
with previous ND rallies, Singaporeans who succeeded in overcoming the
odds were singled out for the spotlight to fall on them to generate the
feel-good factor.
All the goodies to be dished out like help for
the low and middle income groups, support for part-time degree
students, changes to pre-school education, more buses, two more
universities are laudable and will improve the quality of life and give
more opportunities for Singaporeans (using my two eyes here).
PM
Lee bemoaned the the lack of graciousness of Singaporeans and nasty
anti-foreigner comments particularly online. The finger points at the
regime for its ultra generous immigration policies to all and sundry,
mainly from third world countries.
PM Lee Hsien Loong warns taxes will rise if social spending increases. 9% GST coming
BusinessWeek, 26 Aug 2012
Singapore
will need to raise taxes in the next two decades as the government
boosts social spending to support an aging population, Prime Minister
Lee Hsien Loong said as he proposed measures to boost the country’s
birth rate.
“With a shrinking working population, an inadequate birth
rate and a higher dependency ratio, there is an inevitability that
taxes will have to be raised,” said Vishnu Varathan, a Singapore-based
economist at Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd. “I don’t think anything will
change in our tax policy to make us less competitive in the next five to
10 years, but the prime minister is talking about something much
further out.”
Full story
Related:
PM Lee, cut excessive defence spending, Brompton bikes, Herman Miller chairs before talking about raising taxes
read more
Same man, Same Speech, No Solution and he is on every channels!
I tried to watch the PM rally yesterday; actually it was quite easy as every
channels on TV are showing it. I really make me wonder the logic behind it?
As usual, the same old stuff.
I didn’t really paid 100% attention
to him (not like those at the auditorium who spontaneously break into laughter
at every punch lines PM said) so these are some points I caught.
read more
All Sound And Fury, Signifying Nothing
The indelible image from the National Day Rally (NDR)speech was a poor
girl squashing herself into her seat by the wall, hoping it will open up
and swallow her whole to spare her the embarrassment of her life. The
other cringe worthy moment was the yarn about an 87 year old auntie
shooting 50 hoops every morning at Teck Ghee. Maybe Lance Armstrong
should have adopted her porridge and Horlicks diet instead of
performance enhancing potions.
The NDR delivery was supposed to be our equivalent of the American State
of the Union address. Once upon a time Lee Kuan Yew used it as a
powerful platform to launch his epochal plans for the nation, such as
the stop at two(1960s - stop making babies) and graduate mother(1983 -
start making babies) policies.
Sometimes he would use the occasion to
remind Singaporeans who's in charge "..and even from my sickbed, even
if you are going to lower me to the grave and I feel that something is
going wrong, I'll get up!" (NDR 1988).
read more
PM Lee National Day Rally Speech
It's about 10:15 am now. I collected those comments on the PM's NDR
speech with 11 or more likes. My proxy for resonance. I am particularly
worried about Lois Lai "free this, free that" suggestion. Aichi Chong
garnered 38 likes (I added myself later) which is way ahead of any other
comment.
These days practically nobody view their children as their old age
pension. This is good but we have forgotten a very important reason why
people have so many kids in the past. Even biologists concluded that
having many offspring is Nature's way of ensuring survival of the
species. However we have interfered so successfully with Nature and gone
to the other extreme. Poorer societies are closer to nature than us.
They use less energy, control their environment less and they also have
more children.
We will not solve our problem of low birth rate. Let's hope we are lucky
since we aren't willing to pay the price to overcome a declining
population.
read more
One or two?
The PM announced last evening that men will also be
entitled to paternity leave,
similar to women's maternity leave, to look after their just borned
child. Everyone in the University Cultural Centre auditorium that I
could see through the TV broadcast clapped in approval, particularly the
women amongst them. The rationale? PM related an example of a women who
voiced her fears that she would be forgotten by her employer if she
took as long as 6 months maternity leave.
So fathers should step in to
shoulder this burden by being allowed to take similar leave to share the
burden of nursing the baby. All of which is dandy, until you think
about it further.
Would men not also be forgotten at the workplace when they take
paternity leave? The couple can now share equally the 4 months of
maternity leave that women are entitled to, that is 2 months each. And
even supposing it is 1 month out of the 4 for the men, it is probably 1
month too long for the men to be absent from the office. In this
dog-eat-dog world, if you are not around, you need not be around,
period. So sharing this load might lead to
both of the
couple, the mother and the father, to become expendable employees. Which
is better - to have one expendable person or two?
read more
Singapore National Day Rally: Home Hope Heart HDB!
OK not necessarily in that order and beating down our cynicism down like
beat the mole for once, that was a pretty good theme for the Rally
speech. The speech inspired more or less depending on how cynical one
was at different parts of the speech, especially near the end I was
super frustrated. I wanted to watch Super 8 as it started at 10pm and
wanted PM to rush through his speech. In the end, this year's message to
me was simple with the touch of nostalgia, plus Mediacorp's programme
on old school shops and Labour bar soap from yesteryear inserted into
the interval before PM started his rhetoric was great spin!
Ever since the GE where PAP lost a GRC, there have been many
symbolic changes on power sharing. Last year, for the first time ever
since 1965, opposition MPs attended the Rally. That is a a good
precedent and this year was no different signalling that the Rally
should be party-neutral as much as possible.
Just like this year's NDP
where the MPs discarded their whites and light blues, and wore hues of
red when they took the grandstand seats and graced the parade
party-neutral. Bravo, and I'm not sniggering, serious!
PM Lee, cut excessive defence spending before talking about raising taxes
During PM's speech last night, a topic of raising taxes was brought up.
It was made to make you believe that we have no alternative but to raise
taxes in the near future. But we don't have to take that route. All we
need to do is to cut down the mad, mad, over expenditure on defence.
As social spending rises, taxes will eventually go up
As
spending on social services increases, so too must taxes - albeit not
immediately but "certainly within" the next two decades, said Prime
Minister Lee Hsien Loong yesterday.
Singapore is already relying
on its reserves - by spending part of the returns from investing them -
to pay for benefits, and the S$8 billion cut of Net Investment Returns
Contributions last year helped to foot 14 per cent of Government
expenditures including special transfers.
read more
Of Hope, Heart and Home
Hsien Loong’s main themes were the heart, hope and home. When the heart
was not there, hope was dashed, and home became a big burden and a
troublesome factor in their lives. Many pains were inflicted on the
people because of the missing heart. Policies were shafted down the
people’s throat in a very arrogant way, dismissing the people as non
entities.
This is how I am going to do it. Like it or not, the people
just have to live with it.
What is really needed, instead of reactionary piece meal solutions, is
to flush the slimy little heart, if it is still there, with sulphuric
acid to get rid of the black stains of the past, to start with a new
heart. Instal a new set of heartware into the system and hope and home
will fall into place.
read more
We will engage all Singaporeans in a national conversation: Heng Swee Kiat
Yahoo! News
Education
Minister Heng Swee Keat said government will engage all Singaporeans in
a national conversation about how to take the country forward by
"putting Singaporeans at the heart of our concerns".
He highlighted
three goals that the national conversation will seek to achieve:
reaffirm what is good and still relevant, see what has changed and
recalibrate accordingly and, refresh and innovate by
chartinhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifg new directions.
"It will
be an opportunity for Singaporeans to come together, and ask: What
matters most? Where do we want to go as a country, as a people?"
Full story
Related:
Before PM had the idea of a national conversation - Singapore Democrats
read more
Law Society applies for order to determine M Ravi’s mental health
Yahoo! News Singapore, 24 Aug 2012
The
Law Society of Singapore (LSS) has applied for a court order to have
lawyer M Ravi checked by a registered medical practitioner to determine
if he is fit to practise law in the city-state.
Based on the
originating summons filed and served on Ravi on 14 August, the Society
wants him to be given 14 days to comply, or else have his practising
certificate suspended.
The Society also requests for Ravi’s certificate to be suspended if the medical report declares him unfit to practise law.
Full story
read more
Law Society members want it to explain recent clash with lawyer M Ravi
A group of about 50 lawyers have filed a motion on Friday for the Law
Society of Singapore (LAWSOC) to hold an Extraordinary General Meeting
(EGM) to explain the recent debacle between one of its officials, Mr
Wong Siew Hong and Mr M Ravi.
The group, who are all members of the LAWSOC, is led by Mr Noor Marican of Messer Marican & Associates.
According
to Mr Marican who spoke to the local media on Thursdy (23rd August),
some members have expressed concern over the incident and have not
received a full explaination as to what had transpired.
The behavior of the Law Society of Singapore (LSS) leaves very much
to be desired indeed. After a series of bungles, which give the
impression of a society seemingly acting like a headless chicken, it now
wants lawyer M Ravi committed to the Institute of Mental Health (IMH).
This
comes after a lawsuit has been lodged against the society and one Mr
Wong Siew Hong, its chairman of its Member Care committee; and a motion
filed with the society and backed up by “
more than 50 members”
for the society “to hold an extraordinary general meeting (EGM) to
explain what led to the recent debate between one of its officials, Mr
Wong Siew Hong, and Mr Ravi.”
It all started on 15 July when Mr
Wong received a letter from psychiatrist, Dr Calvin Fones, who had seen
and assessed Mr Ravi’s state of mind on
14 July.
In his letter, which was addressed to the “Law Society”, Dr Fones said
Mr Ravi was “having a manic relapse of his bipolar disorder” and added
that Mr Ravi “is currently unfit to practice law and his illness is
likely to affect his professional capacity.”
read more
Exco of Lawless Society, not M Ravi, should see psychiatrist
The high-handed Lawless Society wants M Ravi to see a psychiatrist or
else his practising cert would be suspended. I think the EXCO members of
the Lawless Society need to see the psychiatrist or else the Registrar
of Societies revokes their licence to operate as a society. Just who do
these high handed guys think they are?
I have no love for M Ravi
and neither do I support the causes he fights for. However, every person
has a right to say his piece, as well as a right to a living. Lawless
Society is trying to break M Ravi's spirit and rice bowl by giving all
sorts of excuses to have his licence suspended. I feel the Lawless
Society's licence to operate is the one that needs to be suspended.
This
is not the first time the Lawless Society tried to stop M Ravi.
Supporters of M Ravi, as well as his non-supporters (like myself),
remember only too well the comical attempt Lawless Society made when
they barged into a court hearing where M Ravi was representing a client.
Here's that comical incident which the judge bundled off the Lawless
Society's reps -
Lawless Society gatecrashes M Ravi's party, gets buttkicked by Judge
read more
Pastor uses Woffles Wu case to argue against jail term for providing false information
The Woffles Wu case has opened a Pandora’s box for the judicial
system in Singapore with subsequent offenders of similar offences now
using it as a precedent to appeal against a jail sentence.
Woffles Wu (pic left) was sentenced to only a $1,000 fine instead of a
usual jail term for providing false information to the traffic police
by getting his elderly employee to take the rap for his speeding
offences.
The verdict sparked a massive outcry among Singaporeans forcing the
Attorney-General Chambers and the Law Minister to issue a public
statement to explain the reasoning behind the uncharacteristic light
sentence for Woffles.
Now, pastor Steven Yang from Eternal Life Baptist Church is using the
Woffles case to appeal against his jail sentence of two weeks for
giving false information under the Customs Act.
read more
Parliamentarians must set aside partisan interests
Mr Chiang thought that Dr Ong didn’t know what happened during the
parliament discussions on Dr Wu. From Mr Chiang’s reply, it seems like
the other way round – it was Mr Chiang who didn’t know what happened.
Law minister Shanmugam merely showed six cases, a tiny fraction of
the thousands of cases relevant to Dr Wu’s case. These six cases were
far from adequate to show that Dr Wu’s case was in line with all such
cases. It was therefore meaningless to ask Ms Lim to clarify her
position since any position based on six out of thousands of cases was
bound to be inadequate and meaningless.
It was wrong of Mr Chiang to say that accepting Mr Shanmugam’s
argument meant confirming the integrity of the system as there was no
way of confirming the integrity of the system just by looking at six
cases. To confirm the integrity of the system, all cases must be shown
to be in line with Dr Wu’s case. If just one case is not in line with
Dr Wu’s case, the integrity of the system is compromised.
Oral answer by Minister for Law, K Shanmugam, to Parliamentary Questions
on the Woffles Wu case, 13 Aug 2012,
http://app2.mlaw.gov.sg/News/tabid/204/Default.aspx?ItemId=689
read more
Plastic Surgeon Woffle Wu's abeting case VS Singapore Pastor's Lie to Custom Officer
Singapore Pastor Steven Yang Suan Piau was jailed for 2 weeks for lying
to Custom officer about the 3/4 tank filled in his car even though he
had installed a fuel tank switch. Plastic Surgeon Dr Woffle Wu had asked
his elderly staff to take the rap for speeding offense to evade a fine
and demerit points. Dr Woffle Wu was given a STERN warning and was fined
$1500.
Law Minister Shanmugan said in Parliament that Dr Woffle's case was not a
case of bias because there were many cases where offenders were let off
with a light sentence.
Pastor Yang with a mandate from God had lied to custom officer about his
less than 3/4 fuel tank to save on fuel and to evade GST of about $107.00 (assume he pump an equilvant of S$100 worth of petrol in JB) was given 2 weeks jail.
Why The Double Standard?
Singapore Law and Foreign Affairs Minister K Shanmugam has explained
why he made public the case involving a resident who made racial slurs
against a neighbour.
Many netizens had questioned Mr Shanmugam's motive,
including what the incident said about Singapore and if Indians are
being targeted.
On August 21, Mr Shanmugam had written about a resident
who was upset that he had to tolerate his Indian neighbours, their smell
and unwashed bodies. Mr Shanmugam described the complaints as being
quite disturbing as it appears the man sees his neighbour's race as
being the problem.
read more
State media: Singaporean man supports family of eight with monthly salary of $1800
Soon after Singapore’s Supreme Leader Lee Kuan Yew berates his
subjects for not having babies, the state media has gone on a propaganda
offensive to drive home the point.
The Chinese tabloids reported yesterday of a 36 year old Singapore
man Liu Lin Wei who has five children and whose wife is currently
pregnant with the sixth:
Mr Liu stayed with his wife and children in a 3-room HDB flat. After subtracting for CPF, he takes home only $1,500.
read more
Why people didn’t care to be the richest country in the world
It must have annoyed a lot of people to see on the front page of the
Straits Times, Wednesday 15 August 2012, the boast that Singapore was
the ‘richest country in the world’, validated by another hitherto
unheard-of ranking study.
There might have been a time when people here would have taken pride
in such an accolade. What better proof that all the sacrifices made in
the decades post-independence had paid off, and that our city-state had
arrived? But several people I spoke too pointed out that not only do we
know it isn’t easy to be the richest country in the world, we look
around us and we can clearly see so much that is wrong. “Richest country
in the world” can’t possibly mean what it means in plain language.
It can only mean another empty boast.
read more
After A Watershed Election: Paradoxes, Perils, Promises
Someone once described the ideal audience as intelligent, highly
educated and a little drunk. Well, you qualify except on the last point.
But there’s somebody among you who’s probably now wishing for a stiff
drink or two to calm her nerves. This is a nice, caring friend of mine
who worries endlessly on my account, because of a what she calls my ‘
daring and dangerous’ political speeches.
When I told her that my talk
this evening would be about Mr Lee Kuan Yew, she let out a little shriek
of horror, threw up her hands, rolled her eyes, shook her head, and
said in utmost exasperation, ‘You really are so
mm-chai-see!’
And she genuinely believes that right here, hidden among you somewhere
is this hall, is a PAP man in black with the handcuffs at the ready, to
escort me out after the lecture!
I would like to say to my kind, nervous friend, ‘It’s okay. There’s
no need to be afraid.’ Ten years ago, five years ago, maybe even as
recently as one and half years ago, public speakers would need to be a
little afraid if they dared to speak on politically sensitive topics,
that is, those subjects forbidden by the famous out-of-bounds markers.
But since the amazing General Election of last year, things have
changed, and today it’s okay for Singaporeans to speak freely and openly
(but civilly and respectfully, of course) on any issue of national
interest and concern.
read more
Tackling the baby challenge
Why did we want to have kids? If we had we conducted a standard
cost-benefit analysis (CBA), here’s how it would have looked like: High
initial costs of prenatal and delivery fees, medical check-ups, infant
care and childcare fees. There would be 25 years or more of continuous
expenditure from diapers to degrees.
Since we don’t expect our kids to
support us in our old age, the payback period is infinity. So using the
CBA approach, the conclusion would have been that this child-raising
project should not be undertaken.
This is a clear departure from previous generations, where the costs
for raising kids were not so high, the period of upbringing was shorter
(since children left school and went out to work earlier), and children
were presumed to be the parents’ old age social security policy.
Racism in Singapore
Recently the outcry against racism is getting louder. Many, even a
minister, are raising issues of racism openly. Yes, there are incidents
of racism in this island and there is nothing to hide, or better to
sweep them under the carpet.
The case of this elderly man berating his
Indian neighbour for unpleasant smell, unhygienic lifestyle, and turning
his flat into a squalor, has been given special prominence by the
minister in his Facebook posting.
What is the intent of the minister, to
prove that there is racism, to use this as an issue in the national
dialogue or to say that racism exists in little pockets in the society?
read more
Scholarships for foreigners, debts for Singaporeans
Finally, the foreign scholar issue has hit the papers.
I have struggled
to comprehend this strange educational policy since I stepped into the
National University of Singapore and realised that for my course’s
cohort of around 60 pupils, 2 Singaporeans are on the NUS scholarship, 1
Malaysian is on the ASEAN scholarship and 17 Chinese Nationals are on
the Undergraduate Scholarship for PRC students (
website: National
University of Singapore).
While foreigners enjoy the luxury of
studying without worrying about monetary issues, my fellow Singaporeans
step into society ridden with debt. Some of them work to finance their
studies and others take bank loans which leave them with a debt of more
than S$24,000 when they step out into society. They have to pay their
tuition fees and accomodation, all out of their own pocket.
read more
