03/12/2013

Planning For Singapore’s Future

DRAFT MASTER PLAN 2013

imgoverview3
The Draft Master Plan 2013 is driven by the vision of an inclusive, highly liveable, economically vibrant and green home for all Singaporeans. As a small city-state, we have to ensure that sufficient land is available to accommodate a whole range of land uses, including greenery and other critical needs such as housing, schools and employment centres.

We strive to plan for a quality living environment with amenities for all ages within reach, bringing jobs closer to homes, as well as creating green, healthy and connected towns with strong communities united in diversity.

The planning strategies to achieve the vision for Draft Master Plan 2013 are presented through these six key focuses.


read more

URA Draft Master Plan 2013: Exciting plans, but execution could be difficult, say experts

An artist's impression of the Kampong Bugis precinct. Property consultants warn that while the plans offer "exciting" new proposals for some areas, the difficulty would be in the execution of these plan. -- PHOTO: URBAN REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

The latest blueprint for Singapore's development offers "exciting" new proposals for some areas, while fleshing out details of ambitious plans that been hinted at previously, property consultants said on Wednesday morning.

But they warned that the difficulty would be in the execution of these plans, many of which aim to make Singapore a greener city.

Their comments came after the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) released the Draft Master Plan 2013 at 3am on Wednesday

URA Draft Master Plan 2013:



URA has bold ideas to balance development, conservation: PM Lee


The Urban Redevelopment Authority's (URA) new blueprint for the country has "bold ideas" to balance development with conservation and green space, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said in a Facebook post yesterday. -- ST FILE PHOTO: LIM YAOHUI

The Urban Redevelopment Authority's (URA) new blueprint for the country has "bold ideas" to balance development with conservation and green space, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said in a Facebook post yesterday.

"How to allow new development, while protecting space for green living and conservation on our little island, is a constant challenge," he wrote.

 "Urban Redevelopment Authority's team has come up with bold ideas to strike a good balance, and improve our quality of life.".

read more

Spore plans waterfront city, sets land for 500k homes under Draft Master Plan An overview of the URA's draft master plan for Singapore. (Screengrab from URA website; click here for the interactive map)
Yahoo Newsroom - An overview of the URA's draft master plan for Singapore. (Screengrab from URA website; click here for the interactive map)

Singapore’s government on Wednesday revealed plans to build new housing areas and establish a waterfront city under a draft master plan

“The key focus of the Draft Master Plan 2013 is to build townships for all ages that are green, healthy, connected, strong in community interaction and spirit, and to bring quality jobs closer to home,” the Urban Redevelopment Authority said


The agency announced that new housing areas will be developed at Bidadari, Tampines North and Punggol Matilda.

read more

8m population by 2030?

Earlier this year, Singaporeans balked at the idea of having 6.9 million people on our tiny island. But some experts, including Dr Parag Khanna, Senior Fellow at the Singapore Institute of International Affairs, has said that Singapore can fit 8 million or more by 2030.

That is, if urban planning plays its part in spreading out the load.

"There is a much more physically devolved Singapore in which the towns play a much stronger role, in which there's much more local economic activity and vibrancy, in which everyone is not cramping down into Orchard or CBD every single day. And that Singapore can most certainly accommodate a couple million more people."

read more

Singapore is already a global city
ST_20131202_CCTRENDS02C_3945093e

BY SEVERAL counts, Singapore is a global city and does not need to advertise itself as one, academic Parag Khanna has argued. At The Straits Times Global Outlook Forum last Friday, he said Singapore fulfilled many of the characteristics of a global city, which to him is one that is stable, wealthy, diverse, connected, creative and a role model for others.

The rise of global cities was a topic that Dr Khanna, director of the Hybrid Reality Institute and senior fellow at the Singapore Institute of International Affairs, spoke about at a lunchtime talk at the forum.

He also touched on megatrends such as the devolution of power and the rise of regionalism, and how these impacted on Singapore.

read more

Young eyes on the URA Master Plan 2013
Jurong development
(Image of areas in Jurong to be developed, taken from URA website)

On Nov 20, the Urban Redevelopment Authority rolled out a series of plans for the (re)development of the Singapore landscape – getting pages of free advertising in the process. Lots of plans in the works, for housing, transport, recreation, the economy, public space, and even our identity. There are plans for every region, and brochures for each, for convenient reading. Our undergraduates write about what they think of the promises made in this masterplan.

Up, up and away - What’s the big deal about a masterplan for land use? Isn’t it just some crystal ball gazing that comes every five years or so? After all, the same themes of decentralisation, cycling, green spaces, development of Marina South and conserving heritage are at play again. My neighbourhood, Jurong East, was hyped up five years back, when a previous edition of the URA Master Plan was released in 2008.

Really, the big question to be asked is what sort of progress has been made with the old masterplan? Has the URA delivered?

read more

URA Draft Master Plan has attracted good response: Khaw
An artists impression of Holland Village. The response to the Urban Redevelopment Authority's new blueprint for the country has been "very encouraging", Minister for National Development Khaw Boon Wan said in a blog post on Tuesday. - PHOTO: URA

 The response to the Urban Redevelopment Authority's new blueprint for the country has been "very encouraging", Minister for National Development Khaw Boon Wan said in a blog post on Tuesday

The Draft Master Plan 2013 guides land use over the next 10 to 15 years with revisions every five years. URA is seeking feedback on proposals such as community-friendly, fenceless residential precincts with fewer cars, planning of cycling routes, shaping public spaces, and developing the Southern Waterfront area

 Mr Khaw wrote that the cycling community has been sharing ideas with URA and is excited about the plans to promote cycling as a green mode of transport. "There has also been positive feedback on our plans to enhance the Civic District into a pedestrian-friendly precinct."



More urged to give views, show support for URA Draft Master Plan 2013


Generic shot of HDB flats under construction at Punggol, taken from Punggol Road on Oct 14, 2013. After three years of ramped-up building, the Housing Board is tapering off its "massive construction programme" from next year, Minister for National Development Khaw Boon Wan said on Dec 2, 2013. -- ST FILE PHOTO: ASHLEIGH SIM

After three years of ramped-up building, the Housing Board is tapering off its "massive construction programme" from next year, Minister for National Development Khaw Boon Wan said on Monday

"We will do so in a measured way, to allow the market to gradually adjust, just like what we had done to cool the property market earlier," he added.

In a post on his blog, Housing Matters, Mr Khaw said that three years of higher supply had begun to restore balance in the housing market. One sign of this, he said, was lower cash-over-valuation figures in the resale market for Housing Board flats.

read more

URA unveils Draft Master Plan 2013 ready to house 6.9M

Overall, enough land has been earmarked for 500,000 new homes – mostly public housing. Census [Link] showed that the Singapore’s average household size dropped from 3.7 in 2000 to 3.5 in 2010. Assuming the same rate of decline, Singapore’s average household size could come to about 3.1 by 2030. This means the 500,000 new homes in 10 to 15 years’ time could be housing another 1.5 – 1.6 million residents in Singapore.

Given that the current population in Singapore is about 5.4 million [Link], it appears that the PAP government is really expecting to grow the population to about 6.9 – 7 million by 2030. The Draft Master Plan 2013 and key highlights are available for viewing at the following website: http://www.ura.gov.sg/MS/DMP2013.

URA is also seeking feedback and proposals from the public. It said that any objection to or representation concerning any of the proposals for amendment to the Draft Master Plan 2013 must be submitted in writing to the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of National Development, 5 Maxwell Road, Singapore 069110 no later than 19 December 2013.



10 WAYS THE URA’S DRAFT MASTER PLAN 2013 WILL AFFECT YOUR LIFE
http://therealsingapore.com/content/10-ways-ura%E2%80%99s-draft-master-plan-2013-will-affect-your-life
MASTERPLAN 2013 - The Draft Master Plan is the statutory land use plan that guides Singapore’s development over the next 10 to 15 years.  The Draft Master Plan Written Statement provides a detailed explanation of the permissible land use, development intensity and other related information and is read in conjunction with the Draft Master Plan 2013

1. The Great South: An entirely new area called the Greater Southern Waterfront will be developed on 1,000 ha on the south coastline once the ports move from Pasir Panjang and Tanjong Pagar to Tuas by 2027. Look out for new skyline in Singapore.

2. More Marina action: A district called Marina South will take shape next to Marina Bay with eco-friendly features, including bike paths and a 800 metre-long car-free street.

read more

Govt considering underground masterplan: Khaw

AN UNDERGROUND city with shopping malls, research facilities and even cycling lanes

This is worth exploring to make Singapore "even more exciting and liveable", said National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan on his blog on Tuesday, suggesting that the Government is considering an "underground" masterplan.

The current land use masterplan, last reviewed in 2008, sets out how much needs to be built to efficiently spread the population across the island.

"We are currently in the midst of updating our master- plan... In parallel, we are thinking about the possibility of developing an underground equivalent... to see how practical underground plans can complement the above-ground masterplan," revealed the minister.

read more

When the G should just buy ads

The URA took out gigantic ads today in the press, except that it didn’t pay for them. And it had professionals working on the copy, with headlines that screamed “news!”. It’s a PR person’s dream. Wait a minute, it IS news. It must be since it’s about the unveiling of, gasp!, a draft URA Masterplan. 

According to ST, the sweeping plan was “unveiled today”. I don’t know about you, but I did a double-take since print media is usually a day late and will say that it was unveiled “yesterday”. Then TODAY made things clearer when it said the information was embargoed till 3am

Woah! That’s a new one! I’ve heard of embargoes calculated to give the evening broadcast news first bite, or embargoes imposed because the information was market-sensitive… but a 3am embargo? Maybe it was meant for foreign media who work at 3am for a different part of the world, but it can’t be since foreign media don’t get invited to press briefings. Maybe it was to give online news a heads-up, but really who’s up to reading breaking news at that time? And the G has never thought much of online media, it’s MSM they are most concerned about. So clearly, the objective is simply to keep the plan under wraps until the URA thinks it’s time to make it public, like 3am



THE 2013 MASTER PLAN IS NONSENSE!

I was filled with shock and disgust when I realised that the 2013 master plan was disguised as propaganda, claiming to benefit Singaporeans when the reality is that it is destroying our heritage and sanity to benefit Singaporeans. I will explain more in further detail.

Who will it be likely to benefit? The biggest change that this master plan intends to bring about is the introduction of homes in the central area. At present, the current properties that are in the central region are not particularly accessible to average Singaporean families. These are either too expensive ($2 million for a loft) or too cramped ($900,000 for a 2-bedroom shoebox). As per other developments, it looks like such homes will benefit a few local yuppies but mainly will go to being occupied by highly paid expats.

At what expense does such development come with? Looking at the past news, we have already seen heritage sites such as Bukit Brown being irrevocable destroyed in the name of development. Upon closer inspection, it seems that Kampung Glam is part of a plan to have 4,000 new homes that will fall under the definition of “central region”. But the issue here is that a walk to Kampung Glam will reveal much heritage where we can no longer make up for once it is made for redevelopment!


read more

New Master Plan for 500,000 new homes

This new Master Plan is called a draft Master Plan. Well, it is the new Master Plan for the next 10 to 15 years, or between 2023 to 2028. Would it make any difference if it is a draft or not a draft plan? At 4 persons per new homes, this plan can comfortably accommodate another 2 million residents.

The PWP of 6.9m is for year 2030 and for an increase in population from 5.3m, or an increase of 1.6m in 17 years time. So the two plans seem to be complementary to each other. Some may want to quibble why 7.4m (5.4m +2m) in 2028 and not 6.9m in 2030? Let’s not split hair (or split cables) over such a small discrepancy.

Many Sinkies must be salivating at this prospect, looking forward to such great places to live and play. And being public housing, they will definitely be sold at a discount from market prices, or with a generous dose of subsidies. The future is surely looking so rosy. Boon Wan is planning well ahead.

read more

Want to live near the CBD? Public housing may not be your top choice
For a Pinnacle@Duxton project is not always available for Singaporeans with aspiring HDB dreams

If you are thinking of living near the central business district  (CBD) for a quicker commute to work, you can forget about waiting out for a good Build-To-Order (BTO) launch, or even an Executive Condominium (EC) launch for that matter.

The Housing & Development Board (HDB) and the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) release plots of land for residential development from time to time.

Looking at land sites released over the past year, you would notice that most of the sites within 15 – 16km to the CBD (or 30 – 45 minutes on public transport*) have been released for private property development.

read more

URA Draft Master Plan 2013: Ideas wanted for 1,000-hectare Great Southern Waterfront

An artist's impression of the Greater Southern Waterfront, a vast slice of coastal land that will be freed up once the ports move from Pasir Panjang and Tanjong Pagar to Tuas by 2027. -- PHOTO: URA

A vast slice of coastal land will be freed up once the ports move from Pasir Panjang and Tanjong Pagar to Tuas by 2027.

Some ideas have already emerged from government planners for the 1,000-hectare area that will be known as the Greater Southern Waterfront.

These range from erecting a barrage around Pulau Brani to form another reservoir and network of streetside canals, to creating a single continuous waterfront promenade that snakes around the coast.

related:
More housing in Holland Village, Kampong Bugis and new Marina South district


Marina Bay and Greater Southern Waterfront Sustainability Study

AECOM was commissioned by the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) for a sustainable development framework, planning and design for Marina Bay as well as the adjacent Greater Southern Waterfront (GSW).

The 360 hectares Marina Bay will be Singapore’s key focus of development for the next decade and was designed to seamlessly extend the downtown district and further support the city-state’s continuing growth as a major business and financial hub in Asia. Spanning 120 hectares, the GSW was included in the consultancy to synergize with Marina Bay’s new developments.

A long—term conceptual master plan, the study will see the city benefiting from six key areas: a series of unique waterfront districts; extending downtown Singapore seamlessly to the water’s edge; extending Marina Bay’s Central Linear Park to promote a network of walkable public space; establishing a new reservoir for rainwater harvesting along with a human-scale canal area; creating a continuous 30-km waterfront pathway for walking and cycling; and connecting green space to form a contiguous ecological corridor benefitting people and wildlife.


Developments of the Greater Southern Waterfront
Future Greater Southern Waterfront (credits: URA)

By 2027, the City Terminals (at Tanjang Pagar, Keppel and Pulau Brani) and Pasir Panjang terminal will all be relocated and consolidated at Tuas, leaving behind a thousand hectares of land. This humongous piece of land which is about 3 times the size of Marina Bay will be used for development of the future Greater Southern Waterfront.

Presently, the Bayfront and Marina Central area are still under development. But as we can already see, for the past few years, with new attractions such as the Flyer, The Helix pedestrian bridge and not to forget the iconic Marina Bay Sands coming up, the entire area has evolved to a waterfront promenade bustling with activities. Likewise, the Greater Southern Waterfront which will be built after the relocation of all the terminals will be the next waterfront city in Singapore.

Creating a premier, live-work-play environment, extending the City and transforming our home to a continuous waterfront. Below are some of the possibilities that could be happening to our future Southern Waterfront City

read more

URA unveils concept for Greater Southern Waterfront
The land that will be freed up by the relocation of the container terminals such as the Pasir Panjang Terminal may allow for an expansion of public spaces. PHOTO: REUTERS

More than a year after plans were first announced to free up prime land for development by consolidating all container port activities in Tuas, Singaporeans have been given a glimpse of the vast transformation that could take place along the Republic’s southern front.

Preliminary conceptual plans unveiled by the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) under its draft Master Plan include an uninterrupted 30km stretch of waterfront promenade that extends from Labrador Park to Marina South and encompasses Pulau Brani, a new reservoir created between the offshore island and Tanjong Pagar, and new residential and commercial districts along the coastline.

The Greater Southern Waterfront — with a land area about three times the size of Marina Bay — is “envisioned to be a seamless extension of the city and will open up new live-work-play opportunities”, the URA said.

read more

MASTERPLAN 2013

The Draft Master Plan is the statutory land use plan that guides Singapore’s development over the next 10 to 15 years.  The Draft Master Plan Written Statement provides a detailed explanation of the permissible land use, development intensity and other related information and is read in conjunction with the Draft Master Plan 2013.


  1. The Great South: An entirely new area called the Greater Southern Waterfront will be developed on 1,000 ha on the south coastline once the ports move from Pasir Panjang and Tanjong Pagar to Tuas by 2027. Look out for new skyline in Singapore. 
  2. More Marina action: A district called Marina South will take shape next to Marina Bay with eco-friendly features, including bike paths and a 800 metre-long car-free street.
  3. Keeping that neighbourhood charm: Holland Village, Jalan Kayu and Serangoon Garden have been added to Singapore’s list of “identity nodes” in recognition of their unique, historical charm. Over 70 buildings will be conserved including Alexandra Hospital, Commonwealth Avenue wet market and former military buildings in Seletar.

read more

Everything you need to know about Singapore’s draft Master Plan 2013 in 60 seconds


  1. Marina South: New developments include 1) an 800 metre-long pedestrian street with an underground shopping mall connecting two MRT stations (Marina South and Gardens by the Bay); 2) A high-rise walkway from Gardens by the Bay right to the seafront; and 3) 9,000 new private housing units.
  2. Holland Village: 1,500 new homes have been proposed, with new public spaces (a community park and a urban plaza). Holland Village’s streets will be made pedestrian-friendly, with a proposed road to divert traffic from the area.
  3. Kampong Bugis (a 10-min walk from Kallang Road): Set to be an eco-friendly and car-reduced precinct. There will be fewer car parks and water taxis could be offered as an alternative transport to the city. It will serve as a new international model for water management in high-density precincts. There will be 700 new housing units and  3,000 hotel rooms.


read more

Our Future, Our Home

The Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) announced the opening of the Draft Master Plan 2013 exhibition today. The key focus of the Draft Master Plan 2013 is to build townships for all ages that are green, healthy, connected, strong in community interaction and spirit, and to bring quality jobs closer to home.

The Draft Master Plan 2013 aims to make Singapore a better home for our people through: 

  • Providing a quality living environment with a variety of housing options 
  • Bringing quality jobs closer to home and growing the financial and business hub in the city 
  • Expanding green and recreational spaces for all 
  • Building an endearing home 
  • Enhancing our transport connectivity and accessibility 
  • Enlivening our public spaces

read more

02/12/2013

Tackling poverty the 'kuih lapis' way

A multi-layered approach tailored to the diverse needs of poor families can lift them from their 'dark valleys'


Blue, green and red pen markers in hand, Minister for Social and Family Development Chan Chun Sing drew up a chart on a big sheet of paper, like an economics professor explaining a concept to his class.

He had called for the interview at the office of his ministry last Friday in the hope of resolving once and for all a contentious debate over how best to help the needy.

First, he makes it clear, any measure - be it the Gini co-efficient that tracks income inequality, or an absolute or relative poverty line to measure the number of poor - has its flaws or quirks and can give a very false picture of the situation in a country. So approach with caution.

related:

read more

Kuih lapis or kuih talam?

The ST report ended this way: He says that it is not an indictment on anybody that Singapore has poor people – every society has them. (Agree. It’s not an indictment on the G either if that’s what he is worried about.)

“But the circumstances don’t define us. Our responses to the circumstances define us. That’s the message we want to give. So I hope people don’t ask, ‘Are you hiding (poverty), do you not dare to define it?’ No, what’s there to hide? You want to know, I will tell you everything.”

Very well, minister. There are some questions above. And this last one: Can we have both the kuih lapis – and the kuih talam?

read more

Our Kueh lapis way of tackling poverty woes

Dead poor, or just Poor?

By ‘dead poor’ our PM probably refers to the invisible ‘homeless’ on the streets, a population which was supposedly ‘eradicated’ according to Kishore Mabubhani in 2001. However, he needs to be more explicit on what it means to be ‘unsheltered’. If you define ‘unsheltered’ as not having a roof over your head, which ‘layer’ does a family of 4 who lives in a VAN in East Coast Park fall under?

To be fair, it’s hard to fix an income threshold for the needy, given that the sole breadwinner living in his company vehicle earns $2,100 a month, more than some bus drivers. Compare this to celebrity Darren Lim who makes a three-room Lagoon 400S2 catamaran his home. Both have a ‘roof over their heads’ , but clearly one family, due to unforseen circumstances, is at the bottom layer of the kueh lapis model.

Is a family who can’t afford a HDB flat that they have to make do in the back of a van ‘dead poor’? Even if you did have a roof over your head, what if had to put up with 10 kids in a room? Or sleep on a discarded sofa in the corridor? How about wandering about parks and beaches living in tents? Maybe the ‘dead poor’ is an apt definition of the destitute after all, because they’re practically ghosts in the eyes of a government that prides itself in looking after every Singaporean very well.

Don’t need poverty line: “Kueh lapis”


Very sad” education statistics? - To illustrate the failings of our “kueh lapis” approach to social assistance, I would like to highlight some statistics on education.

I have chosen the education statistics to hone in my contention, because in a sense, the problems of inadequate financial assistance in education for needy children  are arguably not as visible in our daily lives. In contrast, for example, for healthcare – we can see people who can’t pay for healthcare; for homelessness – we can see the homeless, the homeless shelters; for poverty – we can see old people selling tissue papers, picking up empty drink cans, cardboard boxes; etc

1)Independent schools? - Why is it that the percentage of students on subsidies in the independent schools was only about 7.8 per cent of the estimated total student population in the independent schools (2,700 divided by 34,769)

read more

Multiple Lines of Assistance


Looks good, so many lines of assistance. By the way, I can't find a line for public transport. I am interested because Lui Tuck Yew rued that only half of the transport vouchers were given away. I think it is across lines.

What most of us endeavor to do is not to use any of them. This is the best way to make sure we have enough for those who really needs them. However all of us get the long red line which is the most costly. It wouldn't make sense unless all the layers above also get to enjoy everything that is offered at the base. This is where we must focus our worries on. It is the place that trapped the poor in place no matter how you try to help them.

At the end of the day a poverty marker using income is only useful if the government would use it. This government is unwilling and I think the issue at its core is getting people out of the vicious cycle of poverty and preventing the at risk from falling into it. What matters is results. Everything else are means.


TACKLING POVERTY



Poverty is a significant problem in Singapore: senior citizens scrounging for cardboard and aluminum cans to sell to recyclers, cleaners sleeping in public to save on transport costs, and even outright homelessness. Amid the futuristic weaves of The Interlace and the iconically quirky design of the Marina Bay Sands, the prevalence of such overt poverty is shocking.

In this article, I hope to articulate the need for a coherent response to poverty and show, by way of example, that such a response is indeed possible.

What gets measured gets managed? Minister for Social and Family Development Chan Chun Sing is right that no single poverty line should be drawn; that we should not introduce policy that includes a "cliff effect”. However, Chan's argument that poverty should not be administratively recognized on the basis of the deep flaws of a policy straw man is fundamentally unsound.

read more

Tackling poverty is everybody’s problem

POVERTY exists in Singapore. But poverty exists in every country. So the fact that it occurs here is not particularly surprising. What would be of concern is if the incidence of poverty was prevalent, or if it was worsening, either in numbers or in depth

The problem is that we do not really know. This is because there is no clear definition of poverty in Singapore

By some monetary measures, we ought to be worried. The bottom 20 per cent of wage earners saw their real wages fall by 8 per cent between 1998 and 2010, while the top 20 per cent of earners saw their real wages rise by 27 per cent. Some academics have put the percentage of Singaporean households living below the basic household income of $1,500 at more than 10 per cent, or 110,000 households

read more

The Case For A Singapore Poverty Line

Minister Chan Chun Sing prefers to use a "kueh lapis" approach to deal with poverty in Singapore

There has been prominent discussion lately pertaining to whether or not Singapore should have a poverty line set in place. Our government has suggested that a “kueh lapis” approach is preferred and more relevant than an actual poverty line in place.

This is surprising considering that a poverty line, if ever set in place, is a tool useful to measure the level of income adequate for living in a given country. It is particularly more useful for developed nations such as Singapore, whereby the international standard of $1.90 is no longer relevant for us.

For the government to dismiss it as irrelevant is…unexpected.

read more

Looking Out For Themselves

Politicians should stop using food analogies to explain policy making. There was the mee-siam-mai-hum debacle, and there was the $10 chye tow kway gaffe. Even Lee Kuan Yew tripped over the extra egg that goes with his hawker meal portion because, well, he thinks he deserves it.

Using "kueh lapis" to dismiss an official poverty line with their "multi-layer help" approach is flawed at the start. Anybody who has seen a sample of the sweet dessert will recognise the many rainbow colored lines, the result of compositing thin layers of butter, eggs and sugar, each laid down alternately and then grilled separately. None are so blind as those who do not see.

Lee Hsien Loong says a poverty line like the World Bank's measure of $1.50 a day is irrelevant since there are no "dead poor" in Singapore, which he defines as those who are starving and unsheltered. By his Cambridge Senior Wrangler (students who gain first-class degrees in mathematics) logic, those living in public housing but can afford only one meal a day are not poor. That must be why Lily Neo had a hard time asking for more money for the poor from Vivian Balakrishnan, and was rebuffed with the wicked hawker center, food court or restaurant line

read more

Don’t need poverty line: so many needy students not helped?

I refer to the article “PM: We don’t need poverty line to help the poor” (Sunday Times, Nov 17).

Don’t need poverty line? It states that “Singapore is past the point where a poverty line is useful, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong indicated yesterday, as its groups of needy now take shifting and multi-faceted form.

“Kueh lapis” approach to social assistance? Hence, the Government’s “kueh lapis” approach to social assistance, he said, summoning a metaphor that Minister of Social and Family Development Chan Chun Sing used to describe the multi-layered help it provides to those in need.”

“Very sad” education statistics? To illustrate the failings of our “kueh lapis” approach to social assistance, I would like to highlight some statistics on education.


What does PM Lee plan to do with the New Poor in SG?

What does PM Lee plan to do now that he admits to the existence of poverty in kueh lapis layers?

There are a few things not quite right with PM Lee’s case that “Singapore is past the point of where the poverty line would be useful”. He pointed out that Singapore has moved beyond “extreme poverty” because Singaporeans are living with not less than $1.90 a day – the United Nation’s benchmark for extreme poverty.

If one is to reverse the comparison and compare his wages against the salary paid to politicians across the world, one cannot help but conclude that he is on the other end of the spectrum with extreme wealth.

Now, for one with extreme wealth to give definition to another to define him as not poor based on a subsistence level of $1.90 is truly something. Anyone who can bring himself to such a conclusion must either be a hypocrite or someone devoid of a charitable heart.

read more

PAP leaders fail miserably using food analogies to talk

In the year 2005, PM Lee in his National Day Rally speech, showed two video clips “Tao Gay Not Enough”, and “Tao Gay Never Enough” (http://bit.ly/Ibqw4j), to make a point. Did it resonate with the people? One commenter responding to PM Lee’s speech then said:

“Frankly speaking, the clips…were rather boring, and they ain’t as funny as to excite even a twitch on my face. Till now, I am still mystified as to why the people in the audience guffawed. The airconditioning must be pumping in laughing gas the whole time. That probably explains why PM Lee laughed so much, albeit alone, during his speech. Wonder if the PM’s aides adviced him that while jokes are good to have in a speech, the jokes must, first and foremost, be FUNNY!!!…They should have chosen a Rojak stall setting with peanuts as part of the title. The clip should be titled “Peanuts Not Enough”.I would definitely ask for an extra helping of peanuts on my rojak. Guess the government is out of them this year. So, they only have tou gay.” (http://bit.ly/18hhy02)

Then in the 2006 Rally, possibly in response to mrbrown‘s Bak Chor Mee Man podcast (http://bit.ly/1d9jUC3), Mr Lee said, “You put out a funny podcast, you talk about bak chor mee. I will say mee siam mai harm. Then we compete. Then what will I do? I will hire Jack Neo to be my National Day Rally adviser. It’ll be a fun time, we will enjoy thoroughly, go home totally entertained.” (http://bit.ly/1injNCO)

read more

Mind your slip, ministers

If metaphor, analogy and turn of phrase sound tricky and you try and steer clear, you are not alone. But not our politicians, who are in the habit of using figures of speech and unusual lingo to make a point. The problem is, they are often off the mark and end up achieving effects which are totally unintended.

This past week, both PM Lee Hsien Loong and Chan Chun Sing have used “kueh lapis” (cake of Indonesian origin) as a metaphor to refer to multi-layered help for the poor. This has prompted netizens to retort that even a poor man does not live on kueh alone, and that the government is trying to have its cake and eat it – addressing poverty without defining a poverty line.

Both men have been at it before. At a National Day rally speech, PM Lee tried to show connection with heartlanders by giving the example of ordering “mee siam mai hum” (mee siam without cockles). Except that in the first place, there are no cockles in mee siam and he not only failed to make his point but drew flak for messing up his order (which should have been either for laksa or char kway teow).

read more

Different layers of aid for S'poreans, based on needs: Shanmugam
Mr Shanmugam, who is also an MP for Nee Soon GRC, said: "We look at needs; we do have an income threshold - $500 per capita (for this programme).

"For other types of assistance, we look at a much higher per capita.

"Many events, like this (event), take place every weekend all over Singapore. We are helping people on the ground and it is not defined by a single line."

read more

Government 'will look out for asset-rich, cash-poor' older Singaporeans

The Government's move towards a more progressive tax system will help address the concerns of asset-rich, cash-poor older Singaporeans, Acting Minister for Culture, Community and Youth Lawrence Wong said yesterday

In designing its tax system, the Government is "very mindful of this particular group of sandwiched Singaporeans", he said in response to concerns raised by residents of Joo Chiat in a dialogue

For instance, it has moved away from using Housing Board flat type as the qualifying criteria for Budget surplus sharing schemes, he said.

These schemes now use the annual value of property, which Mr Wong said is a "fairer system" because owners of lower-end private property can also benefit.

read more

Govt rejects poverty line, says prosperity line better for social objective
Chan Chun Sing
“Who will go after tampon throwers if we focus on the poor?”

The government was today baffled by calls from social workers and experts to define an official poverty line, when the problem had been declared extinct a good twelve years ago.

It was in 2001 when former diplomat Kishore Mahbubani proudly told the world: “There are no homeless, destitute or starving people in Singapore. Poverty has been eradicated.”

With such a bold proclamation coming from a respected thought leader and current Dean of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, government officials have since operated on the premise that poor people exist only in third world countries.

read more

Assistance schemes for needy
'Range of aid for needy, flexible rules' Chan Chun Sing assures MPs worried about S'poreans missing out

SINGAPORE has many helplines for people with differing needs, and the rules are flexible when they do not meet the qualifying criteria but are genuinely in need, said Minister for Social and Family Development Chan Chun Sing in Parliament yesterday.

This assurance from Mr Chan came amid renewed calls for Singapore to identify an official poverty line after Hong Kong set one in September. Some MPs had argued it would focus on the state of poverty here and track how it is addressed.

But Mr Chan had rejected their argument at last month's parliamentary session. He said it risks a "cliff effect", where those below the poverty line get all forms of help while citizens who are genuinely in need but outside the poverty line are excluded.

read more

387,187 IN POVERTY?

I refer to the article “Median household income rose to $7,870 last year, inequality down” (Straits Times, Feb 18).

Real median household income rose 1.6% - It states that “Median household income rose to $7,870 last year, 4 per cent up from 2012, according to a Department of Statistics releaseon Tuesday. After accounting for inflation, the rise was 1.6 per cent from 2012.” According to the Key Household Income Trends 2013 report released today – the Median Household Income from Work Per Household Member only increased in real terms by 1.9% per annum, from 2008 to 2013, lower than the 3.2% per annum from 2003 to 2008.

Income per household member of the 3 lowest deciles? - Average Monthly Household Income from Work Per Household Member Among Resident Employed Households by Deciles – 1st to 10th, 11th to 20th and 21st to 3oth deciles were only $463, $896 and $1,268, respectively last year.


How do Singapore's poor families get by?

Nurhaida, 29, who is unemployed with six children in Singapore, says it is difficult to make ends meet

Nurhaida Binte Jantan is making dinner. She is roasting otah-otah, a Malay dish of fish paste wrapped in banana leaves, over a portable stove.
She is a 29-year-old unemployed single mother with six children from five to 13 years old. She lives in a tiny flat, just 30 square metres, with little furnishing.
There is no dining table, so the children eat their otah-otah with rice and chillies crouched on the floor.
related:


UNDERSTANDING POVERTY IN SINGAPORE: A REALITY CHECK

A lot has been said about helping the poor in Singapore, and while it’s heartening to see the leadership coming out to encourage people to help the less fortunate, I’m actually skeptical that such appeals to the general public would hold any clout and actually make life better for the poor.

For one, Singaporeans are not known for their spirit of volunteerism. I’m not saying we’re a nation of heartless and inhumane citizens, but let’s do a reality check: how many people actually come forward to volunteer their time and effort on a sustained basis for the benefit of the destitute in Singapore? Most people would probably think it’s a lot easier to simply donate money, and then get on with their lives.

That is if they bother with donations in the first place. I always believed that in addressing poverty issues, one has to take a very realistic approach, instead of the conventional way that seeks to tug at heartstrings– at the end of the day, what the destitute and underprivileged need are not your emphaties (or is it really sympathies?), but rather real solutions that provide for a roof over their heads and putting food on the table.


Poverty in Singapore

There are various categories of being poor in Singapore. (No official line yet, but some are calling for an official poverty line to be defined [t1])

Some could be the old and frail – these are the elderly living on their own, either with no children or children who have abandoned them. They have no means to work and more so if they are sick, they may not be mobile and hence are dependent on others.

We could also have parents not earning enough to make ends meet – partly because they have quite a number of children, in addition to elderly parents so they are the sandwiched generation.



Singapore: Best Place to Live and Work
Plight Of The Tissue Peddlers
Have you ever Spoken to a Cardboard Uncle or Aunty?
Singapore’s Story: What comes next
Singapore at 50: From swamp to skyscrapers
Singapore Good Old Times
The Poor & Homeless in Singapore
Support for the Needy and Elderly
The Singapore Story
Other Side of The Singapore Story

ChasingThe Singapore Dream
To Be Or Not To Be Singaporeans
Longing for the good old days
Singapore: A Sampan or a Cruise ship?
Singapore at 50: From swamp to skyscrapers
Singapore is ‘World’s Costliest City To Live In’
Coping with Inflation & Cost Of Living
COL goes Up, Up, Up!
Singapore “Swiss” Standard of Living
Tackling poverty the 'kuih lapis' way
Callings for a Poverty Line
Setting a poverty line may not be helpful
A minimum wage for Singapore?

No homeless,destitute starving people in S'pore:Poverty has been eradicated
Growing Up With Less

01/12/2013

8 Sleeping Positions and Their Effects on Health

sleepingpillow

1. On Your Back, Arms at Sides
Sleeping on your back with your arms at your side is generally considered to be the best sleeping position for spine health and it’s good for your neck, too, as long as you don’t use too many pillows. That said, back sleepers tend to snore more than those in any other position and sleep apnea is strongly associated with sleeping on the back.

2. On Your Back, Arms Up
This so-called “starfish” position is also good for the back. Whether you have your arms up around your pillow or not, sleeping on your back may also help to prevent facial wrinkles and skin breakouts. However, like the arms-down back sleeping position, this one can also result in snoring and problems with acid reflux. Plus, having your arms up can put pressure on nerves in your shoulders, leading to pain.

3. Face Down
Sleeping on your stomach can improve digestion but unless you’ve developed a way to breathe through your pillow, it most likely leads to you tilting your face in one direction or the other. This can put a lot of strain on the neck. Sleeping face down can also cause back pain, as the curve of the spine is not supported.

4. Fetal Position
Sleeping all curled up into a ball with your knees drawn up and your chin tilted down might be comfortable but it can do a number on your back and neck.

The extreme curl of the fetal position can also restrict deep breathing. That considered, sleeping like a fetus can have you sleeping like a baby if you typically have problems with snoring or if you’re pregnant

5. On Side, Arms at Sides
When you’re sleeping on your side with both arms down, the spine is best supported in its natural curve. This can definitely help reduce back and neck pain while also reducing sleep apnea. The downside? Sleeping on the side can contribute to skin aging due to gravity, meaning facial wrinkles and sagging breasts.

6. On Side, Arms Out
This position has many of the same benefits of sleeping on your side with your arms straight down. However, any side sleeping can cause shoulder and arm pain due to restricted blood flow and pressure on the nerves, which may be exacerbated by having your arms out in front of you.

7. On the Right Side
If you’re a side-sleeper, which side you sleep on also makes a difference. Sleeping on the right side can worsen heartburn while sleeping on the left side can put strain on internal organs like the liver, lungs, and stomach (while minimizing acid reflux). For pregnant sleepers, doctors typically advise sleeping on the left side, since this can improve circulation to the fetus.

8. Pillow-Supplemented
Regardless of which sleeping position you prefer, it’s highly likely that you can get a better night’s rest with less pain in the morning by supplementing your body with a pillow.

Back sleepers can put a small pillow under the arch of their spine, side sleepers can place a pillow between their knees, and stomach sleepers can place a pillow under their hips to support the joints and allow for full, pain-free relaxation.

read more